I’m working on a Psychology question and need guidance to help me study.

s1

Being more mindful can have many advantages! Read the article on the Benefits of Mindfulness.

Consider the following, in your opinion, how is mindful leadership beneficial? Think specifically about the proven scientific benefits of mindfulness, leadership and mindful leadership. This may require some additional research.

s

Explore Chapter 3 of your Mindful Leadership text (Gonzalez, 2012) and the article on the many Mindfulness Exercises you can try on your own. You may also think outside of the box by exploring some Mindfulness Apps – Mindful and Insight Timer are some good places to start!

Think about how you might apply some of these exercises in the workforce, especially as a leader. Specifically, think about your particular career field. Can these be applied there too? Why or why not? What other Mindful Exercises could you deploy?

s

Take an opportunity to practice some Mindfulness Exercises via this guided video.

f

In a 2-3 page essay, (1) discuss your thoughts on how mindful leadership is beneficial, including what has been scientifically proven, (2) discuss how you might deploy some of the mindfulness exercises of the article, especially in your field/workplace. Finally, based on Step 3 (mindful exercise video), (3) discuss your thoughts and experience engaging in mindfulness exercises. Be sure to discuss how beneficial it was to you, and the extent to which you now feel more mindful. Your essay should contain properly formatted citations and be free of spelling/grammar errors.

CATEGORY

Exceeds Competency

90-100

Competent

80-89

Developing Competency

70-79

Not Competent

69 and below

Introduction/

Thesis

The introduction is inviting. It grabs the reader’s attention and compels him/her to read further. Engaging lead/hook.

The introduction clearly states the main topic and previews the structure of the paper, but is not particularly inviting to the reader.

The introduction states the main topic, but does not adequately preview the structure of the paper nor is it particularly inviting to the reader.

There is no clear introduction of the main topic or structure of the paper.

Content/Body Paragraphs/

Evidence

There is one clear, well-focused conflict/problem to be resolved. Author uses dialogue, action, and description to show not tell the story.

Main idea is clear but the supporting information is general. More detail needed to “show not tell” the story.

Main idea is somewhat clear but there is a need for more supporting information. Author mostly tells the story instead of showing it.

The main idea is not clear. There is a seemingly random collection of information.

Organization –

Logical /

Chronological

Details are placed in a logical order and the way they are presented effectively keeps the interest of the reader.

Details are placed in a logical order, but the way in which they are presented/introduced sometimes makes the writing less interesting.

Some details are not in a logical or expected order, and this distracts the reader.

Many details are not in a logical or expected order. There is little sense that the writing is organized.

Grammar/Punctuation /APA Style

Writer makes no errors in grammar or punctuation, so the paper is exceptionally easy to read. Follows APA style.

Writer makes 1 or 2 errors in grammar or punctuation, but the paper is still easy to read. Missing one or two elements of APA style.

Writer makes a few errors in grammar and/or punctuation that catch the reader’s attention and interrupt the flow.

Missing most APA formatting.

Writer makes several errors in grammar and/or punctuation that catch the reader’s attention and greatly interrupt the flow. No APA style.

Vocabulary/Spelling

Writer uses vivid words and phrases that linger or draw pictures in the reader’s mind, and the choice and placement of the words seems accurate, natural and not forced.

Writer uses vivid words and phrases that linger or draw pictures in the reader’s mind, but occasionally the words are used inaccurately or seem overdone.

Writer uses words that communicate clearly, but the writing lacks variety, punch or flair.

Writer uses a limited vocabulary that does not communicate strongly or capture the reader’s interest. Jargon or clichés may be present and detract from the meaning.

Conclusion

Voice/Fluency

The conclusion is strong and leaves the reader with a feeling that they understand what the writer is “getting at.”

Coherence supported by correct pronunciation, confident enunciation and articulation. Pauses are purposeful and enhance fluency. No noticeable fillers.

The conclusion is recognizable and ties up almost all the loose ends. The “so what” a bit cliché.

Tone fits message, rate and volume are appropriate, pitch seems natural. Careful pronunciation supports coherence. Enunciation and articulation are mostly clear. Minimal audience distractions.

The conclusion is recognizable, but does not tie up several loose ends.

Inconsistent use of voice to hold audience. Rate may be too fast or slow, pitch to high or low. Pronunciation mostly correct though enunciation and articulation are tentative. Speaker recovers from pauses

There is no clear con