[Solved] positions for and against abortion

Despite the difficulties, a kind of midpoint has been achieved in some countries where abortion is legal under some specific circumstances, and only in those cases. For those who are in favor of abortion, this step is insufficient, because it completely eliminates the woman’s possibility of choosing whether or not to carry to term a pregnancy that cannot be interrupted because it does not meet the state requirements (disease for the fetus). or the mother, rape). For those who are against it, it is still an inconceivable concession, given that regardless of the conditions of the pregnancy, the mother or the fetus, the goal is to carry a pregnancy to term regardless of the consequences.

The most used argument to defend the practice of abortion is the one that affirms that the woman has the absolute right to dispose of her body. The freedom of each person is inviolable and therefore, if the woman does not want to have a child even if she is already pregnant, the state should guarantee her that right and provide her with the necessary care to carry out the abortion. It is necessary to think only in the case of a mother of three children who is the head of the family, and who does not have the financial support of a quarter; or the woman who becomes pregnant in an abusive and violent relationship and who does not want to bring the world to a child who grows up in the same circumstances; or someone who is too young to face the challenges of motherhood and does not have the financial infrastructure or emotional support to become a mother. All the above cases are valid. But they are not for the law of many countries.

On the other hand, we must see the social conditions of a given country globally and not in the specific case of each woman. Developing countries where billions of people are trapped in cycles of poverty and ignorance are also the most conducive environments for unwanted pregnancies. In those same countries there are more privileged classes where women have health services and economic infrastructure to carry a pregnancy to term; but these are isolated cases. We must seek global well-being, and think about solving the needs of the poorest, not satisfying the richest and most influential. Abortions carried out in illegal clinics and clandestine hospitals are the ones that cause more deaths among women of childbearing age; allowing abortion would be, respecting the freedom of every woman to dispose of her body,

Another argument by those who are in favor of abortion speaks of the fact that the fertilized embryo, in the first stage of pregnancy, does not yet constitute a human being, but rather a group of cells and therefore, when deciding to terminate the pregnancy, it is not really ending a person’s life. Here the conversation acquires ontological levels because one begins to debate when life begins and when a human being becomes such. Some countries allow abortion before 12 weeks of gestation and other countries allow it until more advanced.

On the flip side of the coin, those who are against abortion, in English called pro-life , point out that the principle of life is more important than the right of women to dispose of their body, since it is about protecting the life of a defenseless being. We return to the discussion of when the fetus is a human being, but above all to put on the table that women’s rights are in the hands of the state.

On the other hand, we must ask ourselves why women’s rights, especially this so intimate and relevant, is in the hands of the state. Do men have to ask permission to freely use their bodies? When has a man been seen suing the state for a vasectomy? Is it not, to some extent, a life-threatening procedure? The standards by which the needs of men and women are addressed are different, and morally elusive.

In order to take a position on abortion, you must first inform yourself. Abortion will continue to be an issue that will always generate confrontations among society, since it will create a division between its detractors and its defenders. But we must also think if we are not too far into history to have to put the private life of women, their options, their preferences and their dreams under the lens of increase. Legislators have no right to decide what women want to do about a pregnancy, because every potential child who comes into the world has the consequences of their parents’ choices on their backs. If a mother considers that she does not want to bring the world to a child for whatever reasons, she must be listened to and given the opportunity for this painful and emotional process to be done in a respectful environment where she feels her voice counts. Likewise, it is also necessary to listen to the mother who, despite medical diagnoses, wants to carry to term a pregnancy that is considered risky. The key point of the discussion is to finally give women a voice.

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get a Discount!

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get a Discount!